Results 1 to 10 of 111

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10
    Senior Member RangeBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    109,908
    There was a while years ago that greentips was having the mods lock any thread, and delete any advertisement, about Beowulf mags. Today he posted

    Quote Originally Posted by greentips
    My personal opinion is that, until the time it is published in an official RCMP bulletin that is the authorized source of interpretation or/and distributed to all stake holders in official letterhead, it is just a copy and paste of a private communication in response to an unknown inquiry.
    Quote Originally Posted by greentips
    For example, let's take CRA and tax cases as an example, a CRA employee may tell you something in a communication in response to your particular inquiry. .

    Until CRA actually publishes the interpretation in their official bulletins, it is just the opinion of one employee in response to a particular inquiry by one person in one case. It is not the official published interpretation of the law by the CRA and has no legal weight, in my opinion. They can do all kind of "internal interpretations" within their organizations, but if it is not published it is not official.

    I am just looking at the technical aspect of how a bureaucracy goes about making an official interpretation of the law.
    Quote Originally Posted by greentips
    It appears that RCMP only tells people privately one by one through private communication in response to certain inquiry, but they are not publishing an official interpretation bulletin in the official channel to the public for all to read per normal procedure when it comes to major interpretation of law by government ministry that has the power to do so.

    Fruit for thought. Internal interpretation/policy in response to inquiry vs official published interpretation that has legal weight.
    Quote Originally Posted by greentips
    Unfortunately, people are publishing these internal letters and writing the PMO, it is going to force the hands.

    People need to think ahead and look at the big picture before doing stuff. We have just induced our own Apocalypse.
    ==============

    A response from the RCMP regarding the legality of 50 Beowulf magazines has recently been made public. In this response, the RCMP have stated that any 50 Beowulf magazine capable of holding more than 5 rounds of ANY ammunition is a prohibited device.
    This directly contradicts the Canadian Firearms Act as well as previous responses from the RCMP including Bulletin 72.
    Despite this contradiction, until this matter is officially resolved, as of November 17, 2015, we are suspending sales of the PCV-50.
    At this time, we are not offering refunds or returns on previously purchased magazine as such sales were considered completely legal as per the Canadian Firearms Act and all information available to us at the time.
    -- http://presscheckventures.3dcartstor...-Gen2_p_8.html


    ==============


  2. The Following User Liked This Post By RangeBob

    Edenchef (11-18-2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •