Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    Moderator kennymo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Winnipeg, MB
    Posts
    10,492
    Quote Originally Posted by SIR VEYOR View Post
    Gecko45 must be getting very excited over this. It’s not a briefcase, but it might be close enough for him.

    The tactical wheelbarrow guy is still unimpressed, I suspect...
    But will it take .338 rounds while his partner assembled the takedown rifle in his briefcase and returns fire?

    “If plan A is to take a .338 Lapua round in the back, WTF is plan B?” (Paraphrased)
    Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.

  2. The Following 2 Users Like This Post By kennymo

    play.soccer (09-14-2018), SIR VEYOR (09-14-2018)

  3. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,852
    I wish Gecko45 would reappear. He's an internet legend now...at least come clean with us.

  4. #13
    Senior Member Strangeday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,043
    Quote Originally Posted by shootemup604 View Post
    I don't think the provincial laws regarding body armour would sustain a charter challenge. It's about a inoffensive an item as you can think of, and the charter protects the right to life - and body armour is clearly designed to protect life.
    I’ve had a Federal agency employee try and play 20 questions with me about one of my Level IV’s and plates. He was all sorts of “thought guy” or at least he tried to be....he got super pissed when I started chuckling and asking him if if was an equity hire representing the unemployable stupid.
    Calvin Martin, Q.C. 1933 - 2014

    I would like to apologize to anyone i have not offended. Please be patient. I will get to you shortly.


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •