Recent content by sewktbk

Thanks sir! cheers

Tried clicking on the GOC contest link, but doesn't seem to work???

Foxer, if your proposed solution is a system based on civilian law that doesn't involve licenses nor the criminalization of mere possession...then whats wrong with Rangebob's system since it achieves those things while still maintaining some levels of checks? And why are you trying to argue that...

That would be nice...but seeing you're in BC, one of us would have to spend the equivalent of a LOT of ammo on a plane ticket :p

Incredible isn't it!

Gun-related accidents have been steadily declining since the 30s, and that decline has continued at about the same rate (unimproved) in the past 2 decades of mandatory training. (the numbers did continue to improve, but the rate of decline hasn't) but they can't say that anyways, because...

If the training absolutely has to be part of the process (which I think is still up for debate), I'd be more in favor of an incentive-based training system. Where for example (and this is just off the top of my head, might require more in-depth thinking and tinkering), the law would state that...

Well there is really no such thing as having a right to be 100% protected from accidents anyways, even with mandatory training. Its still going to happen, and it can't be proven that the training helped efficiently enough to reduce those numbers. Negligent people will always be around. You might...

That sounds a lot more reasonnable than what I had innitially thought you were on board with. I wish you would have explained this system earlier and offered it as an alternative to current system. You had mentionned civillian law using a certain tone which lead me to believe you weren't willing...

Not quite right. 1- You have to pretend to be someone you at the very least somewhat resemble in phyisical appearance (because their photo would show up at time of purchase for comparison), which in itself is not some sort of easy peasy task 2- you have to know this person would show up as...

OK good. I like these examples. Judging by their nature, I suppose you'd include in that list owning and operating airplanes, even small ones, because well, they can drop on people and kill them. Fair assumption? Now, since those are equally dangerous as guns, we have to be philosophically...

Dan, just to start our discussion going again... I've been thinking about this and what you said, and there are two things I'd like to discuss. The first I already asked, which was to know which objects/equipment you'd consider equally dangerous as guns, for which mandatory training and...

The database shows a picture of the individual, as rangebob explained. So you have to either fake the database to look like you (because showing up with a fake license with your photo on it would not match the database), or fake your appearance into looking exactly like the database + drivers...

Cool, lets pick it up tommorow Dan! Cheers, G.