Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member short1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    307
    Thank you Marshall for elaborating on the legalities.

  2. The Following 2 Users Like This Post By short1

    Doug_M (06-25-2015), Edenchef (06-24-2015)

  3. #2
    www.aztecharmory.ca
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Penticton BC
    Posts
    330
    Quote Originally Posted by short1 View Post
    Thank you Marshall for elaborating on the legalities.
    You're welcome!
    It's Not Always a Matter of Need...

  4. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    rural, Alberta
    Posts
    4,755
    I totally agree, sir. But try telling Ian T that he was legal.

  5. #4
    www.aztecharmory.ca
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Penticton BC
    Posts
    330

    Cool

    I'm sure the sarcasm smiley would get a lot of use in discussions such as this...
    It's Not Always a Matter of Need...

  6. The Following User Liked This Post By Marshall

    Edenchef (06-25-2015)

  7. #5
    Senior Member DOOK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    717
    So, just to be clear; an unaltered magazine body without parts is only illegal when you try to import it? As an unassembled magazine body already in Canada without a rivet, indent or other body attached blocking device, that is legal?

    Wasn't there case law on this already? I do believe there was a guy trying to import bodies by themselves to be pinned in Canada. He was charged, and convicted. What is to stop someone from being charged with an unassembled magazine body that hasn't been modified to limit to 5 because a baseplate block is being used?

  8. #6
    www.aztecharmory.ca
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Penticton BC
    Posts
    330
    Quote Originally Posted by DOOK View Post
    So, just to be clear; an unaltered magazine body without parts is only illegal when you try to import it? As an unassembled magazine body already in Canada without a rivet, indent or other body attached blocking device, that is legal?

    Wasn't there case law on this already? I do believe there was a guy trying to import bodies by themselves to be pinned in Canada. He was charged, and convicted. What is to stop someone from being charged with an unassembled magazine body that hasn't been modified to limit to 5 because a baseplate block is being used?
    First let me clarify that I'm not a lawyer or a judge... but I do know what CBSA will and will not allow for import. As mentioned previously, we have had these magazines inspected by CBSA and there was no issue.

    To the point of the question, one could certainly argue that the body alone could be considered prohibited as was the case when the referenced individual was charged and convicted of trying to import them. However, once the magazine is assembled it is no longer a prohibited device as it can be clearly demonstrated that it will not hold more than the specified five or ten rounds. The S&W M&P22 pistol is a good example of an allowable factory 10 round magazine which has an internal block. Only difference between that and ours is their block is easily removed by hand and needs no replacement parts in order to function with the block removed.

    With that all said I suppose if you had the need or desire to transport the empty bodies it would be wise to add a rivet, but as long as they are assembled I see no reason for concern.
    It's Not Always a Matter of Need...

  9. The Following User Liked This Post By Marshall

    short1 (06-26-2015)

  10. #7
    Senior Member RangeBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    110,784
    Quote Originally Posted by DOOK View Post
    I do believe there was a guy trying to import bodies by themselves to be pinned in Canada. He was charged, and convicted.
    R. v. Cancade, 2008/2011 BCCA
    -- 2011 http://canlii.ca/t/fkfmh
    -- 2008 http://caselaw.canada.globe24h.com/0...bcpc-336.shtml

  11. #8
    www.aztecharmory.ca
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Penticton BC
    Posts
    330
    Quote Originally Posted by RangeBob View Post
    If we were take this case as a precedent, then all standard capacity magazines would need to be considered as prohibited devices. As I've mentioned in a previous post, the rivets can easily be removed with nothing more than a multi-tool in in far less time than it has taken me to type this. We just brought in another dozen Gen 2's with no issue at CBSA, so I have to believe that there were other mitigating circumstances surrounding this case.
    It's Not Always a Matter of Need...

  12. #9
    Senior Member short1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    307
    Thank you again Marshall for navigating the minefield that is Canadian Firearms Law.

  13. The Following User Liked This Post By short1

    Edenchef (06-26-2015)

  14. #10
    Senior Member Battle Beaver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Southern Ontario
    Posts
    2,057
    For people like me who already have many (I have 8) Gen3 Pmags, will you be selling the internal block piece separately so I can get rid of my rivet and use these instead?

    And before anyone asks, the fact that these new mags can be disassembled is awesome. During dis-assembly you'll have all the parts separated, and therefore the magazine body by itself. If I were to purchase 8 of the internal block pieces (assuming they're available separately), I'd have to remove the rivets in my existing mag bodies, thereby making them exactly the same as the NEW mag bodies that already come with the insert (mine would have a hold where the rivet was obviously).

    Finally (again assuming you can/will sell the internal blocks), does anyone see any legal issues with doing this to your existing mags??

    Thanks,
    Battle Beaver
    If you truly want to understand the present, or your self, you must begin in the past.
    History is not simply a study of the past, it's an explanation of the present.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •