I'll guess 6pm pst lol
I'll guess 6pm pst lol
Cody1771 (06-12-2017)
The fail with this whole issue is huge.
Several months ago NEA started posing teaser pics of the rifle suggesting it would be NR.
Those are the sorts of things you do to build interest for going live with an "add to cart" option within a couple weeks.
This entire endeavour has shown that NEA does not have a real plan, and they have amateurs at the wheel making decisions.
That is unfortunate because I want NEA to do well. I am cheering for them, I want this rifle, and I have money ready.
However, they seem to be going out of their way to prove that they are incompetent enough not to deserve our money
I have no signature block.
If GOC makes any advertisement money every time we refresh, their bills will be paid up for the next 5 years at least
I hate to say it, but I've learned to be disappointed in NEA, but keep hoping for better.
Travis Kay
linkedin.com/in/kaytravis
twitter.com/traviskay
CCFR, CSSA, NRA member, are you? In the greater Vancouver area? Drop me a PM
mg4201 (08-10-2017)
It's going to take quite a bit for me to replace my xcr-m with the 102, I hope they release it soon and hit a home run.
Travis Kay
linkedin.com/in/kaytravis
twitter.com/traviskay
CCFR, CSSA, NRA member, are you? In the greater Vancouver area? Drop me a PM
All I can say is if they built it any way like they did my nea 15 I'd be more than happy! So far it's been accurate and reliable with both the ccs stock and milspec buffer!
cyph3r (06-12-2017)
So I guess 9 est wasn't the magic hour either...