This is from the original RCMP decision:

1. The Rock River Arms, LAR-15 Pistol qualifies as a "handgun, commonly available in Canada".

2. The cartridge magazine for this handgun as manufactured by C Products LLC has been deemed to be acceptable as a "handgun magazine" as it meets the following criterion:

a) It is designed and manufactured for use in a handgun commonly available in Canada and has a capacity of not more than ten cartridges of the kind or type for which the magazine was designed.

b) The cartridge magazine for this handgun as manufactured by C Products LLC is not an adaption of a magazine designed and manufactured for use in a semi-automatic rifle.

3. The design that has been found acceptable as a handgun magazine is held by the RCMP, Firearms Support Services, Firearms Reference Table Section as a "pattern". This particular design and NO other design is approved for use as a "handgun magazine for a handgun commonly available in Canada".

4. As an assist to identification, the cartridge magazines which have been deemed acceptable as a "a magazine for use in a handgun commonly available in Canada", bear the following identification markings on the body or magazine case, applied at the time of manufacture by the manufacturer:

RRA MODEL LAR-15 PISTOL MAGAZINE
223 REM/5.56 MM NATO - 10 ROUND CAPACITY

NOTE: - No other ten shot capacity magazines are deemed acceptable as "a magazine for use in a handgun commonly available in Canada" as of 2007-03-12.
https://shopquestar.com/shopping65/s...e=Mag%20Ruling

There is a reason for 10 years not one magazine with a 30 round body has been widely used with 10 rounds for the LAR15.

Here is a link to Zahals mags: http://www.zahal.org/products/cpd-la...ada-30-rounds?utm_source=canadiangunnutz.com&utm_medium=Picture& utm_campaign=2017%20September%20Special&utm_conten t=Product[/url]

They, too, were deemed prohibited. Big Bartons has what amounts to an appeal on the Hexmags with the RCMP right now, but I am not holding my breath.