Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    Senior Member Doug_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    10,432
    Quote Originally Posted by SIR VEYOR View Post
    I fully agree. I just thought I’d join in on the long walk, short pier, conspiracy, Train derailment aspect of the thread.
    I certainly believe the point system you described is where the Liberals want to take it. But they were afraid to this time round. We need to keep them afraid.
    Make the Afghanistan War Memorial publicly accessible https://afghanistanwarmemorial.ca/
    https://lavscam.info

  2. The Following 3 Users Like This Post By Doug_M

    FallisCowboy (04-17-2018), ruger#1 (04-14-2019), SIR VEYOR (04-17-2018)

  3. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Rural BC
    Posts
    97
    they will call the AR-15 "a potential M-16", just like the 80% lowers BS. Bam. Prohib. No new laws needed.

  4. #13
    Senior Member Doug_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    10,432
    Quote Originally Posted by manic29 View Post
    they will call the AR-15 "a potential M-16", just like the 80% lowers BS. Bam. Prohib. No new laws needed.
    Nope. The lowers are different. There was that "shelf" thing a while back which would about all the could do if they banned those. When that notice came out I think it was determined that the vast majority of AR-15's weren't affected.
    Make the Afghanistan War Memorial publicly accessible https://afghanistanwarmemorial.ca/
    https://lavscam.info

  5. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    558
    Quote Originally Posted by SIR VEYOR View Post
    I fully agree. I just thought I’d join in on the long walk, short pier, conspiracy, Train derailment aspect of the thread.
    One of the first things you learn in law school...most crimes are conspiracies.

    Good waffle though.

    The big win for them will be removing black guns. This is step one. They are already making laws that used to exist, not exist, to meet their needs.
    "The most important thing you can do in your life is not interfere with somebody else's life."

    -- Frank Zappa

  6. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    3,199
    Quote Originally Posted by Soph View Post
    Good waffle though.
    I’m more of a bacon n egger actually. For waffles, I really prefer:
    Waffle House (pecan waffle rocks)
    Golden Waffle (something about the malt)
    Huddle House
    Smittys
    Denny’s
    IHOP

    Admittedly mostly US places. But a great pancake place is in Drumheller...

    You’ll see I’ve done a few posts of over speculation or “hold my Chardonnay” possible quotes in other threads. So poking the worst case scenario stuff with similar stuff is merely entertainment. Mostly for my own. If you enjoyed or offended, so much the better. Bland indifference means it’s just for me then.
    Last edited by SIR VEYOR; 04-19-2018 at 08:31 AM.

  7. The Following User Liked This Post By SIR VEYOR

    infidel29 (04-21-2018)

  8. #16
    Senior Member RangeBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    35,103
    NFA Guy Lavergne bump

  9. #17
    Senior Member CLW .45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,429
    C-71 analysis and summary by CLW .45

    Increases firearms prohibitions, increases the ability to deny or revoke firearms licences, increases the harassment of the licenced purchase of not yet restricted firearms, and increases the harassment of the requirement to obtain authorization to transport.

    This bill is a blatant violation of your right to defend life, liberty, and property.
    To show that men can travel to the moon and return, use the American experience.

    To show that public safety isnít hurt by responsible individuals carrying to protect life, use the American experience.

  10. The Following 3 Users Like This Post By CLW .45

    manic29 (05-14-2019), Scoutertracker (04-15-2019), Swingerguy (04-15-2019)

  11. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Just left of Sask.
    Posts
    1,468
    Quote Originally Posted by CLW .45 View Post
    C-71 analysis and summary by CLW .45

    Increases firearms prohibitions, increases the ability to deny or revoke firearms licences, increases the harassment of the licenced purchase of not yet restricted firearms, and increases the harassment of the requirement to obtain authorization to transport.

    This bill is a blatant violation of your right to defend life, liberty, and property.

    Yup.
    What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

  12. #19
    Senior Member LB303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    not far enough
    Posts
    4,323
    And if you think running away to the States is a solution, they have their own problems.
    Here's another two-pronged attack by anti-liberty leftists; a combination tax grab plus back-door attempt at registry creation:
    ______________________


    Next on the Gun Grab Agenda: HR 1263 Adds Semiautomatic Rifles and Shotguns to the National Firearms Act of 1986
    By Faye Higbee
    March 7, 2019

    https://dcdirtylaundry.com/next-on-t...s-act-of-1986/

    If you wanted to know the next move of the Gun Control fanatics, look no further than HR 1263, introduced on February 14. Introduced by Democrat Rep. Theodore Deutch of Florida’s 22nd District, the bill would add ANY semi-automatic rifle or shotgun to the National Firearms Act of 1986. What does that mean? It means they would have to be registered or possessing them would be a Federal violation.

    The Bill is titled the “National Firearms Amendments Act of 2019.”

    Here is the Text of HR 1263 (emphasis mine):

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to subject to the requirements of the National Firearms Act any semiautomatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the “National Firearms Amendments Act of 2019”.

    SEC. 2. SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLE WITH CAPACITY TO ACCEPT DETACHABLE MAGAZINE TREATED AS FIREARM UNDER NATIONAL FIREARMS ACT.

    (a) In General.—Section 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—

    (1) by striking “; and (8) a destructive device.” and inserting “; (8) a destructive device; and (9) a semiautomatic rifle or shotgun that has the capacity to accept a detachable ammunition feeding device.”, and

    (2) by adding at the end the following: “The term ‘detachable ammunition feeding device’ means an ammunition feeding device that can be removed from a firearm without disassembly of the firearm action. The term ‘ammunition feeding device’ means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device, but does not include an attached tubular device which is only capable of operating with .22 caliber rimfire ammunition. The term ‘semiautomatic rifle or shotgun’ means any repeating rifle or shotgun which utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fired cartridge case and chamber the next round, and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge.”

    (b) Applicability.—Any person who, on the date of the enactment of this Act, lawfully owns or possesses a semiautomatic rifle or shotgun (as defined in section 5845(a) of such Code, as amended by this Act) that has the capacity to accept a detachable ammunition feeding device (as defined in such section) shall, not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, register the semiautomatic rifle or shotgun in accordance with section 5841 of such Code. Such registration shall become a part of the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record required to be maintained by such section. The prohibition on possession of an unregistered firearm under section 5861 of such Code shall not apply to possession of such a semiautomatic rifle or shotgun that has the capacity to accept such a detachable ammunition feeding device on any date that is 120 days or less after the enactment of this Act.

    (c) Authorization Of Appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act.


    Translation: if you don’t register it before 120 days after enactment, you’re in trouble. You’re not in trouble if you register it prior to the 120 days. (The BATF is charged with enforcement.) The bill was referred to the House Ways and Means Committee, the chairman of which is Richard Neal, a Democrat who has been on the hunt to subpoena Trump’s tax records.

    The bill creates a national registry, something which the NRA has stood against for decades. Whether you have any semiautomatic firearm, call your Congressional representatives and tell them to vote NO.
    ___________________________________

    &
    Found a succinct (for YouTube) video summary linked on the Ruger forum
    hxxps://rugerforum.net/ruger-10-22-rimfire/370277-hr-1263-will-put-ruger-10-22-rifles-under-nfa-act.html


    The beauty of it (for the leftist) is they will get you for non-compliance the same way they got Al Capone, with the tax law.
    Can't get gun bills passed? No problem, Congress loves their tax bills.
    Last edited by LB303; 05-05-2019 at 01:43 PM.
    "If we had a vote tomorrow I would vote, once again, to keep the Registry..." - Justin Trudeau
    "... if Canadians are to trust their government, their government needs to trust Canadians." - Justin Trudeau

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. The Machinery Of Freedom: Illustrated summary
    By lone-wolf in forum Photo and Video Hub
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-21-2015, 01:39 AM
  2. Daily Nanos - Gotta love the analysis
    By soulchaser in forum 2015 Pre/Post Election Debate
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-10-2015, 10:57 AM
  3. [Alberta Election] Debate Analysis
    By MikeyT in forum News and World Headlines
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-13-2012, 09:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •