Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789
Results 81 to 84 of 84
  1. #81
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    3,382
    Headspace is generally irrelevant to accuracy, except in extreme cases and then the rifle has worse problems than poor accuracy.

    A borescope isn't going to show anything that can 100% be linked to poor accuracy. Maybe extreme copper fouling but that can be dealt with more easily simply by cleaning the thing.

  2. #82
    Junior Member Pat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Suputin View Post
    Headspace is generally irrelevant to accuracy, except in extreme cases and then the rifle has worse problems than poor accuracy.

    A borescope isn't going to show anything that can 100% be linked to poor accuracy. Maybe extreme copper fouling but that can be dealt with more easily simply by cleaning the thing.
    With respect, I disagree - a borescope can very quickly show just how much throat erosion is present, and that has a very significant effect on accuracy potential. You can also see if the chambering was centered or not. I used to make rifle barrels for a living, and a borescope was a priceless tool for me to check my work, especially after chambering.

    Headspace may not be as critical, but it certainly can't hurt to check.

  3. #83
    Senior Member Waynetheman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    1,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Suputin View Post
    Headspace is generally irrelevant to accuracy, except in extreme cases and then the rifle has worse problems than poor accuracy.

    A borescope isn't going to show anything that can 100% be linked to poor accuracy. Maybe extreme copper fouling but that can be dealt with more easily simply by cleaning the thing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat View Post
    With respect, I disagree - a borescope can very quickly show just how much throat erosion is present, and that has a very significant effect on accuracy potential. You can also see if the chambering was centered or not. I used to make rifle barrels for a living, and a borescope was a priceless tool for me to check my work, especially after chambering.

    Headspace may not be as critical, but it certainly can't hurt to check.
    Either way is (IMO) irrelevant to this guys issue. As stated earlier in the thread even smoothbore franklin armory guns are putting down better groups than this. It’s gonna be something major, he’s not even gonna be on paper at 100 with those numbers. I feel like you guys can’t see the forest for the trees with all the talk of copper fouling and throat erosion.

    Oh also I think he said it hasn’t shot well since he bought it meaning it won’t be either of those issues.
    Please refer to me as Waynetheperson, I wouldn't want to offend anyone.

  4. The Following User Liked This Post By Waynetheman

    lone-wolf (11-08-2019)

  5. #84
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    3,382
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat View Post
    With respect, I disagree - a borescope can very quickly show just how much throat erosion is present, and that has a very significant effect on accuracy potential. You can also see if the chambering was centered or not. I used to make rifle barrels for a living, and a borescope was a priceless tool for me to check my work, especially after chambering.

    Headspace may not be as critical, but it certainly can't hurt to check.
    I too have chambered and fitted barrels for a living.

    I built a test barrel out of an old and very eroded barrel and it shoots 2-3x as well as the barrel in the OP. An eroded throat will not produce 8MOA accuracy. Also, the OP has owned this rifle from new and reports that it always had crap accuracy, so this is not a case of a worn throat.

    Yes, a borescope is a useful tool for a gunsmith but the average guy isn't going to learn anything from looking down a bore. One of my company test guns has seen so much abuse the gas port has been eroded so badly it looks like an olympic ski jump and that barrel still shoots reasonably well.




    Quote Originally Posted by Waynetheman View Post
    Either way is (IMO) irrelevant to this guys issue. As stated earlier in the thread even smoothbore franklin armory guns are putting down better groups than this. It’s gonna be something major, he’s not even gonna be on paper at 100 with those numbers. I feel like you guys can’t see the forest for the trees with all the talk of copper fouling and throat erosion.
    I spent a lot of time working with subsonics and have shot 100yd groups with unstable projectiles. Bullets spinning completely sideways produce better groups than the OP reports.

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •