Nea may be getting dicked around by rcmp but all I know is to say they're expecting an announcement Monday and then not address the situation when they haven't heard anything leaves a bad taste in my mouth for nea.
NEA 102
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Therapy View PostNea may be getting dicked around by rcmp but all I know is to say they're expecting an announcement Monday and then not address the situation when they haven't heard anything leaves a bad taste in my mouth for nea.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Codyg14 View PostNEA said that rcmp told them they will get the answer this week. So until the weeks over it's all good to me.
My prediction is Friday afternoon. The RCMP probably mailed out the papers Monday. Give Canada Post four days to deliver it, and NEA will disseminate the information as soon as they receive it. That being said, I hope it is today!
Comment
-
Nothing today so don't use all your data.
Welcome to GOC, Site for honest, hardworking Canadians, that own firearms.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pariegh View PostIt isn't close to the MH/MV design though which was designed specifically not to be a variant of the AR-15, it is an actual AR based off the original AR-102 design. NEA's rifle is based on an AR-10 variant that already has a NR status, despite there being few to none in Canada. Pretty much all modern AR-10's are actually scaled up AR-15's and that is why they are restricted.Originally posted by cyph3r View PostWell, when the rcmp does stuff like this, the future of NR AR style rifles does not look so good.
if nea successfully followed original ar10 drawings (adding an sp1 "bump" to meet current interpretation of "law") there should be no issues..... the magazine on the other hand may throw a rock in it.
ar-10a - stoner/sr-25 style (original pattern)
ar-10b - proprietary armalite (modified m14 mags)
i think they would be on safer ground using the m14 mags..... IMHO
Comment
-
For sure,
Cheap and if it can take xcr-m pistol mags? 10 rounds of pew pew.. someone might have a heart attack and find reasons to restrict.
Originally posted by Westicle View Postthe original ar-10 (original run of 10k rifles 1955-1959) predates the ar15/m16 (1957) by a couple years..... technically speaking the ar15 should be a variant of the ar-10.
if nea successfully followed original ar10 drawings (adding an sp1 "bump" to meet current interpretation of "law") there should be no issues..... the magazine on the other hand may throw a rock in it.
ar-10a - stoner/sr-25 style (original pattern)
ar-10b - proprietary armalite (modified m14 mags)
i think they would be on safer ground using the m14 mags..... IMHO
Comment
-
Originally posted by sushix2 View PostFor sure,
Cheap and if it can take xcr-m pistol mags? 10 rounds of pew pew.. someone might have a heart attack and find reasons to restrict.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Westicle View Postyou could still use the aia enfield mags in the ar-10b pattern, they wouldn't have last shot hold open though
but the problem is that those ones don't have the cut out for the magazine retention thing
and I suspect modifying a mag to have that notch would be analogous to "manufacturing" etc etc.. all boils down to do you wanna risk pound you in the ass prison.
Comment
-
-
Actually I didn't see an Ar 10/102 80% lower listed on the list of prohibited ones so I'd say no it was not! Bit I know what you mean lol
Comment
Comment