Please enable HTML Across The Board

[RangeBob]

Alternatively, if one clicks on the Go Advanced button below the new post`reply window, you can disable the Automatically parse links in text option.

I've done that too.
When someone else quotes me when I've done that, they end up with videos that were just links.

[RangeBob]

. .

I can't see the content of post #3678.
But, being able to understand html, I was able to locate the content.

Nov 3 2021, https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/...67741617561600

[joe6167]

Strange, the (original) post appears correctly for me.

[awndray]

Ditto

[awndray]

I can't see the content of post #3678.
But, being able to understand html, I was able to locate the content.

Nov 3 2021, https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/...67741617561600

[ATTACH=CONFIG]35505[/ATTACH]

Curious. Which browser are you using?

[RangeBob]

Curious. Which browser are you using?

Most often for GoC, Firefox/UBlock

[SwissArmyMan]

Another vote for Enabling HTML across the board. Kind of annoying.

[labradort]

Why are we not allowed to embed HTML in certain forums, such as Off Topics, Prepping, and a few others? Given how tweets and social media posts make up an ever growing part of the news and discussions, it's a real PIA not being able to include them.

If any and all HTML was allowed, it would allow injecting all sorts of mayhem into this site. That's why. There's client side code via javascript and sucking in "include" code from remote sites. Entire libraries of code could be injected into a web page, and it would be a mess to sort out. Malware, spam, phishing, ransomware, bitcoin mining, you name it, it would happen. That's at the worst end of the scale. At the least end of badness, the format and display of the forums would be disturbed or defaced.

[awndray]

The question remains, why some but not others?